Camas is
not the only community soon to be saddled with steep increases in water and
sewer rates. Washougal is looking at a 14% increase for the new year.
This fact
has incensed some citizens. In these times of very high unemployment, huge job
loss, skyrocketing health insurance rates, and recent drastic drops in property
assessment values, a notice that water and sewer rates to be shooting upward is
alarming and depressing news.
Why has
Camas and Washougal’s rates taken this drastic jump in cost to the consumer?
For
Washougal it is a combination of things. From our understanding, in the past
4-5 years Washougal’s city government had only placed a 3% increase on these
rates. They were some lax in keeping a good eye out for increases that may
affect the cost to consumers. While Washougal has it’s own wells for water they
are still subject to State and Federal standards. New and continuing standards
coming down from the Federal Government to Washington State
meant that any water or sewer works not in compliance, must do so, or be faced
with fines and non-compliance with the law. By merely placing a 3% increase to
the rates, Washougal was by effect, subsidizing
the true cost of these absolutely necessary utilities. Washougal is not in the
business of loaning out money for the water or sewer costs. They are not there
to subsidize the cost of these utilities, and through their negligence, costs
were rapidly increasing to the city. So, increases were necessary to keep the
water flowing and the toilets flushing to meet the public demand but also
keeping within the mandated guidelines.
There are
other factors, which must be considered too. Washougal’s water pipes and
conveyance systems are in need of repair and in some cases replacement. These
costs must be paid for by the city. Since these costs are directly attributed
to the cost of maintaining water and sewer, it stands to reason the city will
be passing these costs along as well to the consumers.
Could the
city have delayed these costs or made it easier for the public to absorb the
increases? Those are good questions.
What do
you think the city should do?
Is there
any way out of this startling dilemma?